So you’re ready to put together your first deal. You’ve got your playbook mapped out: buy property, increase NOI or roll-up, create value — and profit.

But you can't source debt cheap enough (or enough of it) to get a deal done.

In comes seller financing, discussed below.

A quick sponsor note:

We’ve used “seller financing” on several real estate deals over the past few years to increase our cash on cash returns by 20%+. It also drastically reduced the amount of equity needed to close the deal. An overview of how it works:

My method is simple. In the late stages of negotiation I submit two offers:

One at a lower price.

And one at the exact price the seller wants but with him holding back 10-20% of the purchase price in the form of a 2nd mortgage (with a second position to your bank loan).

Contrary to popular belief seller financing rarely includes the seller holding back 70-80% and acting as your bank.

Two reasons:

#1: Most have some debt on the property.

#2: Most want most of their money right now.

Have you heard the saying “you name the price and i’ll name the terms?” This is a case of that situation exactly. Lets paint a picture here:

I was negotiating with a seller on a property. Not many interested buyers so I knew I had some leverage. His asking price was $4.5MM. I wanted to pay $4.2M. After a week or two and a lot of back and forth I found his lowest number. $4.325MM.

At that point I made the two offers.

One at $4.2MM with normal terms and a bank financed closing. The second at a price of $4.325MM with $500k of “seller financing”.

So lets go over the dynamics:

My advantage is clear. Instead of getting 70% ($3MM) financed through my bank and coming up with the last 30% ($1.3MM)… I finance 70% ($3MM) through my bank, 11.5% ($500k) through the seller, and only needed to come up with 18.5% ($800k).

And when you raise money on a deal the capital you raise is expensive over time. Generally 15% per year is what you pay to your LPs or what you expect as a return on your own capital. But the seller only gets 5%.

A picture of my Letter of Intent:

​

It’s a 5 year term, meaning the rate is locked for 5 years. After that the rate goes up to 7%. This way the seller knows I'm incentivized to pay him off and clear that debt. He doesn't want to be on the hook for 10+ years with money loaned out to me. And my plan is to make the facility more valuable and either sell it or refinance it anyway.

If I ever refinance, which I plan to do at 18 months, I have to clear his loan and pay it off.

Our bank is fine with this because our entire debt obligation on the deal still meets their 1.25x debt service coverage ratio. Aka its juicy, or a good deal with a lot of yield. And my bank has first position. Meaning if we default, they get made whole first + they trust us and like us (that matters, a lot).

I don’t use this on every offer. Definitely not on competitive properties.

And not unless I have some leverage and rapport with the sellers. Because it’s a risk for them. They are your new banker. You stop paying or run the property into the ground, they lose big.

But if you can sell an owner on this structure at a bit higher price, it can be a major win-win. And with interest rates high, like they are today, we've been exploring this tactic more than ever.

Thanks for reading!

Nick

PS. I'm using a new cost segregation firm and it has been a great experience. REcostseg.com (brought to you by Baldridge Financial) is a great, aggressive, low cost option to get your cost segregation studies done. Check them out!